The Distortion Of André Kertész


Discussing warping and distortion in response to some photos I warped via a scanner here, a friend recommended I look up André Kertész as someone who played with distortion. A Google image search shows me an interesting selection of portraits that make the subjects look like stretched blu-tack or the rings of Saturn if they'd gone through a few spin cycles in a washing machine.

It's interesting to see an entire human form captured and moulded like play-doh into spooling, curving, looping abstract figures. It also reminds me, peripherally, of Jenny Saville's work and all sorts of fat acceptance stuff. A lot of popular fat acceptance stuff I see online has this vibe of sanitisation, of being just right - fat but the perfect shape of fat only, curves in the right places. There can be, within pro-fat spaces, a hierarchy of acceptable/appealing fatness. The connection between this and André's work also reminds me of the "lumps and bumps" Commes des Garcons s/s 1997 collection as analysed in an essay here by that friend who mentioned André.

Connections between my personal work and my band ☆

I tend to think of my band as separate from my art practice and I'm not sure why that is. It certainly is an example of both personal and professional development in that it's an ongoing partnership - a collaboration and a business. We make artwork in the form of music, more obviously, but also as pictures and videos (often involving collaborations with other creatives outside the band as well). We build ourselves as a brand and as an entity online too, which is composed of so many little efforts. It's quite an all encompassing project when you consider all the different levels of work that go into it, the web design, copy, methods of release, and so on.

The relationship between me and my bandmate is pretty intense as we're a duo so it's just the two of us. In so many ways it's the perfect collaboration because we are so in tune to each other's ideas and I think for two people making music it's integral to have that really close connection and the ability to tell each other exactly what you like or don't like about something, and exactly what you want out of something. We also each have our strengths and weaknesses and it's a great challenge to slot those together. As individuals we each have something unique to contribute and it's great seeing that turn into some sprawling creature of our combined creation.

We've been a partnership since about March 2012 now, so it's been a good while and we've learnt so much in that time. We've had a few (very varied) music video shoots, heaps of remixes, and 3 album releases! We've found great ways to work alone, together, and with others to get the sound, look, and general style that we want. And it will keep evolving.

But why don't I talk about it in this context? Why do I consider it separate? This band has been ongoing for longer than my course has. It's the most important and successful example of my professional creative work, but for some reason it's been in a different place in my brain. Over the past few months I really feel like everything I've been doing for uni has moved more into the sphere of just "things I'm doing" or "work I'm creating" - generally moving over into my personal sphere and blurring that difference I had in my mind. So I think it's really important to discuss and document some of what I'm doing with my band (and my own music, in fact) in parallel to my other work.

What we are working on right now:
  1. We have just released a full length album: Binocular. This features 5 songs and 5 alternative mixes of those songs, some of which are remixes. This can be found here (along with 3 previous releases): https://itunes.apple.com/gb/album/binocular/id956314543
  2. We have been curating a Tumblr blog full of primarily striking visual inspiration from renaissance paintings to photos of beautiful, happy dogs, to photos of neon lights and flowers and incredible sunsets. This is our main webpage which links to our social media accounts elsewhere, etc, and I love having it be a big museum-like blog of inspiration and beauty. This is here: http://rescueafamily.tumblr.com/
  3. We are working on some new original material and a Rita Ora cover which I am particularly excited about!
  4. It's also worth noting that we earned like 20p from Spotify streaming. Extremely professional!
The band is extremely important to me as a project, a collaboration, and a business. It will be ongoing. Here's a vlog of a recording session and photo shoot:



And here's a video of a 3 song performance in 2014:

Interim Show Initial Thoughts

Today was the stage meeting for the start of this term and we get to really start thinking about our interim shows now, how they're going to be set up, and how we're going to work together. We have organised into three groups based on a common theme running through our work: Technological Utopia, Diaristic Narratives, and Social Responses. These are really useful because we can really situate our work in relation to each other inside these groups. I am part of the Diaristic Narratives group and am really happy with the make up of the group because it's full of people I feel really comfortable working with, people who I know I can ask for help and stuff like that.

Today post stage meeting we all made a floor plan for our show and where each of us will be situated in our week. We also decided to make a Facebook group for our group and talked through a few ideas about lighting, space, and potential poster and drinks options.

Lighting: we were thinking about using spotlights. These are quite dynamic and can have quite a smart look. Holly and Briony want specific lighting conditions, as I believe they are working partially with light and don't want it to be drowned by outside light, nor drowned by darkness.

Space: I'm pretty flexible with space and just need about a square metre of wall space for my work, with no particular requirements concerning what sort of space I need. Louise needs a dark space, and the way the three groups are arranged means that in each group there are only one or two people needing to use a dark space, so this is easily transferred to the next group instead of having to be rationed out/compromised/overcrowded.

Posters, drinks, etc: We were discussing coming up with a name for the show and someone came up with "bed", prompting Holly to draw a cute little symbol of a bed. I think this is a really nice idea in itself, and fitting for the work of some of us, but we'll see how things progress. We want to make posters and are going to share pictures on Facebook until we agree upon a good image to use. As far as drinks go, we would like to have some as they're a staple of openings. We quite fancied having a mystery punch, as this was something that went over really well in last term's Elbow Room.

We have two weeks to hone these ideas, and then we have to set it all up!

My plan for what I'm showing is a wall collage, assembled very messily with sticky tape from a folder of collected drawings, paintings, and other collected images. This will be a test of this mode and I'm hoping to (if it works well) show an extended version of the same principle in the final degree show.

Visualising Soft Sculptures

In a potential future installation, I'd like to make some doll sculptures to sit alongside my book and other things - to bring the book's world into reality. I want them to look purposefully crude and childish, but also adequately reminiscent of my character drawings. These are some general plans about the look and feel of the dolls I'd like to make.


MCP writing planning/methods



I had my first MCP tutorial this week with a small group of students (there were 7 of us). We described our research and focus to each other and then had to explain each other's projects to the group, the idea being that we could pinpoint what parts of our objectives aren't perhaps very clear to an audience. We also discussed methods of getting the work done, and were given these hand outs. I've definitely brainstormed ideas in this haphazard sort of way, although I tend to lean more towards lists to get ideas out of or into my head (although in many cases very messy lists!).

In order to organise my time at the moment, I've started keeping a box of notes. I use a small notepad to make several different lists each day - a general to-do list and more specific ones, lists of things to do daily, or lists of questions or things to look into regarding certain ideas or categories. I find that organising through multiple lists works really well for me, and I can revisit past lists easily if I store them in a dedicated box (looking back on previous lists often provides new ideas or reinvigorates old ideas that I can revisit or elaborate on). There is also a great website called listography.com which I use when I want a digital list. Sometimes I write down a lot of things quickly on a page and then transpose that into an easy to digest list, It means all my ideas are syphoned off onto paper and I don't have to worry I've forgotten something because I know I've written everything down and can thus concentrate fully on one task.

My MCP draft is reasonably close to being complete now, but I need to make sure I'm still working away at it, because some of the bits that are left to retool are quite tough bits. I find it so hard to keep going sometimes after I've been working on a piece of writing for a long time (I've been writing this essay for several months) but I've found it quite encouraging to go through the essay so far with someone else and discuss with them how I can change and expand sections. Having someone else look at your work can give you a fresh perspective and make you feel motivated again.

It also just feels very rewarding to have successfully improved a part of your essay, so I think it's good for me to remember to work small in order to really concentrate on one section and not get overwhelmed, as well as to ask someone else to give me some feedback - I don't need to completely rely on myself reading my essay again and again, desperately trying to figure out a way to change something.

Notes & exhibition ideas following first stage 3 tutorial

The main conclusion I could gather from my tutorial with Richard is that I need to concentrate on/plan for future assessments and ultimately the degree show and really figure out something that I'd like to show that is big enough and bold enough and sure enough. My 360 book is a great little world, but for exhibition purposes I really want to be aiming at bring that world out into a bigger space (like the picture of my wall below, covered with pink paintings).


I have sketched & brainstormed some ideas for a small installation space reminiscent of my original 'Lilly's Clubhouse' placement exhibition idea. I think it would be really fun to have a little corner with all sorts of things poking out of it - shelves, sculptures, paintings, collage, trinkets, my 360 book, and maybe other homemade books of some kind. There are lots of possibilities and I really have to explore this now and try to show something bigger and more world-like.



Dalston Anatomy




Lorenzo Vitturi's show at The Photographer's Gallery focuses on the incredible depth of colour and culture he sees in Dalston. In an interview with Time Out*, he explains that he has "always been interested in states of precariousness." It is clear that, like me, Vitturi has an affinity with the moment - those beautiful and unique instances all around us, thousands and millions of them new and then gone, over, every day. Vitturi says: "Using all this organic stuff like fruit from the market, photography is the only way capture it - otherwise something might only last for five minutes." The transience and expiration of the things/moments pictured in his photographs are integral to his practice, and he marvels in the unique joy of each one.

*The interview is here.